These other considerations are often difficult to value, since they are frequently based on uncertain or qualitative considerations, rather than easily measurable and quantifiable factors.” (Wikipedia, Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement).It is normal for every company to come about bonds and contracts that will oblige their employees to continuously serve for the company after they get training or education that was provided by the establishment. This procedure is somewhat reasonable, the company gets to spend on the personnel’s development, and in return, the employee will need to work for the establishment for the required period. However, it should be remembered that such a benefit is not given to anyone. One has to prove his potential and loyalty for the company to avail of this. The notion of this idea should then divulge trust and confidence in one’s capabilities.In most agreements, it is also expected that one or both of the parties will not be pleased with the outcome of the compromise. Most of the time, it is the employees who end up feeling disappointed. In some cases, finding the middle ground fails to give pleasure to the workers that they end up being less productive and cooperative with the company. This leads to poor execution of duties and inadequate efforts to work together with colleagues. However, preparation for the negotiation process will assist in accomplishing what one truly needs.The understanding gives the impression that HSAC has certainty on the employee’s qualifications, otherwise, such bargain will not even be offered. It also shows that the worker has an amicable working relationship with his/her superior. The trust must have emerged from the performance and the loyalty that was given away by the employee. It is but wise to assume that the staff is worthyof the given opportunity.